Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Hi. > > This time I've gone trough the list of long orphaned packages. > These are packages unlikely to ever get a new maintainer, at least > they didn't manage to do so in the last two to three years. Unless > noted otherwise, the listed packages have no rdepends, and even the > ones that do only have meta-packages as rdepends (CCed since these would > cause RC bugs in those packages). >
Have you hard about bapase? it already takes that information into account. > > Gruesse, Cheers, -- Atomo64 - Raphael Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
