Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> PROP_RM bugs could be RC severity, but if so I would remove the >> mentioning of orphaning in the template so it's clear for everyone that >> it should not be used lightly and strong arguments are needed for >> orphaning instead of removal... > > I would personally prefer to keep the mentioning of orphaning in the > template, because it allows for a "way out" of the problem that should > be mentioned. A maintainer might agree to orphan a package, but disagree > to take the decision to remove it.
Either it should have been PROP_O or strong arguments should be given IMHO like I said above... Just telling that if the maintainer doesn't agree they can orphan without mentioning any arguments not to remove is not the way to go for PROP_RM IMHO... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
