Barry deFreese wrote: > I personally wouldn't care if it was removed, I was just trying to help > with the RC list. I'd be happy to change the url and/or package the new > upstream too if that makes sense > or was this just more work for nothing again?? In terms of getting your fixes uploaded, no. In terms of attending to a package that might be removed before the next release, maybe.
You could have fixed E: alml: duplicate-conffile /etc/texmf/texmf.d/94alml.cnf though and you probably want to write changelog entries for updating standards-version in a way that one can tell whether and which changes you made in order to adapt to the standards. But hey, I do trade an RC bug against a lintian error. Kind regards T. P.S.: For the plr package, it might be nice if you could write something about how to test it. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
