Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: >> also sprach Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.17.1642 >> +0200]: >>> The configuration has been lifted for the bounce handler. The >>> special header is still required for any non d.o machine. But it's >>> going to stay that way, so there's no point in keeping that bug >>> open. Closing it now. >> Isn't this exactly what wontfix is for? Not trying to play bug ping >> pong, so if you disagree, just close it again and I won't spring to >> action anymore. > > Yes, wontfix is there for that, but its usage is not mandatory. It's > interesting when people tend to request the same thing over and over. > In our case, I doubt anyone else will request it again.
Especially for wishlist bugs... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
