On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > crystalspace has been failing to build on alpha for > 1yr, even though a > patch has been available in the BTS for 6 months today. Previous versions > of the package built fine on all architectures, making this a serious > regression and preventing the package's inclusion in a stable release (or in > testing). > > Christian, are you still interested in maintaining this package, or should > it be orphaned/removed from the archive (along with crystalspace-data)? > > If there's a reason the package should not be orphaned, I can do an NMU for > bug #358044 (and 399843) as previously suggested (by someone who apparently > wasn't a DD), but if the package isn't actually being maintained I'd rather > not fix these bugs just to clear the way for an unmaintained package to > enter testing.
Hi Steve, If the package is orphaned, then I will consider to adopt it. So, if possible for you, no immediate removal please. If I adopt the package, then I intend to package a newer upstream release and see how the autobuilders deal with that, before studying the patches in the BTS. This approach has saved me some time before. :) Regards, Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
