Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, José Luis Tallón wrote:
>
>>> It does not look like there have been much work on this issue. I wonder
>>> if it is about time to ask for removal of that package from debian.
>>>
>> Yes, indeed... inmediately after Etch is released.
>>
> You don't have to wait for etch being released for doing that.
>
I only set that event as a significant milestone to refer my timing to.
>>> I think it is time to remove it before more people get their data eaten.
>>>
>> It can't do no harm as it is now, since *nothing* actually uses it.
>>
>
> Well.. it can. People like me can accidentally install it and maybe use it by
> accident. (well - I haven't yet, but ...) It would of course be my own
> fault, running unstable and everything, but it is quite easy to avoid.
>
For a while, I expected that bug to be really confirmed and/or a newer
upstream fixing that (and other) bugs to be released.
I would *love* parted to have native ReiserFS support, but it seems it
will never have it (at least, certainly not via libreiserfs, what a pity)
>>> If you come with a small ack: "Please remove", I can take care of making
>>> the ftp masters aware of this.
>>>
>> What would be the difference w.r.t my requesting that myself?
>>
>
> Nothing. It would be much easier for you if you did it your self. It was
> mostly to be friendly and offer to 'do the hard work', now that I am the one
> asking for it.
>
Thank you, Sune :-)
I would like to do it myself, and immediately after Etch is released, if
you don't mind.
>> Have I somehow been banned from doing anything in Debian by myself
>> without knowing?
>>
>
> Not as far as I know, no ?
>
Sorry if that sounded a bit too 'picky'.
I am quite a bit disappointed with the NM process right now.
Anyway, your interest is much appreciated :-)
And my most sincere thanks for the rest of the work you do in Debian,
specially with KDE ;)
Cheers,
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
