On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 13:44 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/03/07 at 12:38 -0000, Regis Boudin wrote: > > Oops... Just noticed I had a bug and was testing versions the wrong way > > around, so all the cases where the version of a package is the same as in > > the declared conflict gave the wrong result. I will upload pages with > > correct data this evening. > > Could you also add a column with a "conflict number", so it's easy to > just see how many useless conflicts there are in each case ? > > Or just display the total number of conflicts on top ?
Here we go. Still at http://www.imalip.info/debian/ . I also added Slink to the checked releases. Overall, it looks like we have : - 106 pre-slink conflicts - 124 pre-potato - 506 pre-woody - 920 pre-sarge - 1152 pre-etch Also added the list of conflicts against packages not found in any release. Some are packages removed before slink, some are non-i386 packages (aboot), many are completed transitions (python,...), some are virtual-package-like (libdb-dev). Some notes : a lintian test can hardly be done, as it would require checking Packages files from old distributions. The package-doesn't-exists cases would need more different cross-checks to know when the package was in, and what sort of delay is reasonable to consider cleanups for transitions like the python one. Any suggestion/idea is welcome Regis PS : I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me anymore :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
