On 8 Jun 2006 at 4:49, B Thomas wrote:

Hi,

I am the maintainer of the varkon package (together with Balbir - who did not 
respond to my 
last messages. But this is another story).

At the moment I have only sporadic internet access and no Linux box at all due 
to my 
relocation to Berlin. And time is at a premium at the moment as well. So if 
there is anybody 
who wants to help or even become (co-)maintainer I would appreciate it. I am 
open to every 
suggestion how to "rescue" the package.

> I would be very keen that debian have a 3D CAD application.
> BRL-CAD which is also packaged (but with problems) is the
> alternative to varkon (see http://scientificcomputing.net). 

Yeah, a proper 3D CAD application is what is really missing...

> I would like to maintain at least one of these (do not have the 
> time for more, but can help). I'll look into the varkon segfault
> issue this weekend and see if something can be done. Segfault at
> "build time" need not necessarily be a varkon bug.

I would be really glad, if you could solve this issue. On the varkon discussion 
list this bug was 
never mentioned. So propably it's not a varkon bug (I do hope so :-). BTW the 
upstream 
maintainer is very cooperative.

> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:00:32PM +0200, Florent Bayle wrote:

> > I think that "varkon" package should be removed because :
> >   - Today I tried to fix #328039, but after fixing "-fwritable-strings" 
> > bug, I 
> > found a missing build-dep on "libglu1-xorg-dev | libglu1-mesa-dev", and 
> > after 
> > fixing that, I got a segfault (at build time) that I was unable to fix, so 
> > it 
> > seems to be completely broken.
> >   - Last upload was 540 days ago, and there was no new upstream version 
> > since.

Yes indeed, because there was no upstream version. But this does not mean that 
varkon is 
dead. At the moment some discussion is going on about a new gui (to be honest, 
the current 
gui is bit ancient).

> >   - Lintian report a lot of warnings on it.
> >   - Popcon show that it is used by very few users.

That is certainly true. 3D parametric CAD is not what everybody uses everyday.

Best wishes
Stephan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to