On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > > retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives > > reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org > > block 202764 by 275774 > > block 356098 by 275774 > > Is this a new policy to block (RC) bug by the request of removal bug ? > > I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the bug greports so > that anyone trying to fix it will discover that the package is in the > process of being removed ? I quite like the idea; it'll give links to the bugs, to avoid having to search for them, and makes it more obvious on casual inspection the status of the package; for the same reason that the PTS shows "This package has an wnpp entry" information, it causes a "blocked by" link on the bugs.d.o/package page, which would otherwise have no indicator of the existence of the removal bug.
It would be *nice* if reportbug revealed the removal bug too. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
