Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:49:32AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote: >> And should the submitter of a bug be auto-subscribed to the bug? I >> think at present it is possible to carry on a long debate on the BTS >> without the original submitter knowing - which seems to miss the point? > > Auto-subscription probably isn't a good answer, but I think there needs to > be some work on refining the Reply-To's and bugs.debian.org destination > addresses so that the defaults work better -- both to keep submitters more > in the loop in general, and to save me time editing headers to keep users > and maintainers in the loop. ;)
Maybe a standard query when you submit the bug: "would you like to be kept informed about updates to this bug?" would do the trick? cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director 251 Liverpool Road | need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
