Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:35:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Please remove mindi and mondo]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 04:31:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 26 20:31:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlKsu-0003bo-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:31:32 -0800
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3ADD926BA0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 05:31:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2F0F8FFA0; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:31:21 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:31:21 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please remove mindi and mondo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-MIA-Summary: Removing: mondo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove mindi and mondo. mindi depends on mindi-kernel which
has been removed on January 12th because of license issues (see
#223993). mindi is therefore uninstallable. Please remoe mondo as
well since it depends on mindi.
----- Forwarded message from Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Removing mindi?
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:46:18 -0500
To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Mindi depends on mindi-kernel, which had to be removed for license reasons.
(See bug 227757.) QA, what do you think of removing mindi from unstable
as well? It seems correct to me. (In that case, please have someone James
Troup recognizes file a bug against ftp.debian.org.) Or should it
just be removed from testing (in which case I'll send a message to -release)?
--
Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229868-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2004 15:35:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 14 08:35:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C7FLR-0005Uj-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:35:50 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 8C14D64D4A; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:35:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C89CDFE90; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:35:35 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:35:35 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Please remove mindi and mondo]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,SUBJ_REMOVE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
apparently it's fixed.
----- Forwarded message from Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>=
-----
From: Andree Leidenfrost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please remove mindi and mondo
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:19:58 +1000
To: Frank K=FCster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6=20
I agree, #223993 should be closed.
In fact all mindi* and mondo* packages should be fully compliant with
all aspects of Debian Policy and the Maintainers' Guide. If there is
anything oustanding I'd be very keen to hear about it.
For the record, there is currently still an issue with priorities in
mindi, mindi-kernel and mindi-busybox. Updated packages that fix this
are awaiting upload by my sponsors.
Best regards
Andree
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 21:31, Frank K=FCster wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=20
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> >
> > Please remove mindi and mondo. mindi depends on mindi-kernel which
> > has been removed on January 12th because of license issues (see
> > #223993). mindi is therefore uninstallable. Please remoe mondo as
> > well since it depends on mindi.
>=20
> meanwhile, mindi-kernel is in the archive again, even in testing, so
> this bug could be closed, couldn't it?
>=20
> Regards, Frank
--=20
Andree Leidenfrost
Sydney - Australia
----- End forwarded message -----
--=20
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
