On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 12:55:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:05:55PM -0600, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > Yes. I've actually been working on this recently (finally got to a point > > where I could do so) and have taken care of qt-embedded however I > > previously authorized the removal of qt-x11 only to find out that OPIE is > > sitll dependent on pieces of it which qt-embedded does not have and that > > it cannot get from qt3 (or is incompatable with). > > > So it's come down to the choice of qt-x11 going back in (IMO in a stripped > > down fashion only providing the pieces needed...ie minimal library with > > moc & uic) or just removing OPIE until it get's ported to qt-embedded-free > > & qt3. The problem with the later is that who knows when that will > > happen. > > > I'm not sure even how much the op-* packages are being used right now. > > > So: 1) Remove OPIE until it get's ported to qt-embedded-free (ie qte3) > > or 2) Re-Add qt-x11 > > > Suggestions/comments/concerns? > > Given the contents of <http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/stalls.html>, I think > it would be nice if OPIE were removed until it was in a more releasable > state, whether that's by porting it to qt-embedded-free or by preparing > new packages of qt-x11. >
I was just getting ready to ask for it's removal. :) Ivan -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
