On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > Egads! > > > > > > So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orphan it > > > properly, > > > and it's currently a native package. I just converted visualos to a > > > non-native package, so I figure I'll have a go with guile-oops. > > > > > > The bloody thing's got a tarball inside its source tarball. What should I > > > do > > > in this case? Leave it as a native package? Run away? > > > > You have to restart debian version by -1. > > Why? I really don't see why this should be necessary. >
I saw currente release in sid is 1.0.2-2.3, so the choice is among 1.0.3-1 or 1:1.0.2-1, katie will not accept a new .orig file for a non -1 release, AFAIK. Some variations could also be considered, such as 1.0.2.release-1 and so on. -- Francesco P. Lovergine