On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:32:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > > Egads!
> > > 
> > > So I go to try and prepare a QA upload of guile-oops to orphan it 
> > > properly,
> > > and it's currently a native package. I just converted visualos to a
> > > non-native package, so I figure I'll have a go with guile-oops.
> > > 
> > > The bloody thing's got a tarball inside its source tarball. What should I 
> > > do
> > > in this case? Leave it as a native package? Run away?
> > 
> > You have to restart debian version by -1. 
> 
> Why? I really don't see why this should be necessary.
> 

I saw currente release in sid is 1.0.2-2.3, so the choice is
among 1.0.3-1 or 1:1.0.2-1, katie will not accept a new .orig file for a non -1
release, AFAIK. Some variations could also be considered, such as
1.0.2.release-1 and so on.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine

Reply via email to