Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hello > > I'm the current maintainer of setserial. I'm in the process of > getting it adopted (because I do no longer need it, but has not > started that yet). But before I do I'm asking if setserial is needed > at all today? Probably not. If you don't remove it entirely, do get its priority downgraded, and get it out of 'base'.
-- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
