Your message dated Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:07:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line resolved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 16:11:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 27 08:11:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9e7f4fc.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.244.252]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7GP4-0002lK-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 08:11:22 -0800
Received: (qmail 6246 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 16:11:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO atari.stigge.org) (192.168.1.99)
by sbo.stigge.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 16:11:20 -0000
Received: by atari.stigge.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 199C31001DC33; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:11:20 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: Warnings in personal packages overview
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 17:11:20 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
since yesterday, personal "Packages overview" pages
(e.g. http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) contain
lines like:
=============================================================================
Warning: driver initialization failed in
/org/qa.debian.org/web/developer.php on line 381
Warning: Unable to find DBA identifier 0 in
/org/qa.debian.org/web/developer.php on line 382
=============================================================================
These messages are repeated for every single package on the page.
They cause the page to be loaded very slowly. Maybe it slows the server
down significantly?
Thanks for considering.
bye,
Roland
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_GB.UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 240463-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 10:08:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 28 02:08:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7XCy-0002Wg-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 02:08:00 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 17DA464D51; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 32B62FF32; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:07:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:07:35 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: resolved
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This was due to klecker being out of disk space; this has been fixed
now. In the long run, qa will move to another machine which more disk
space.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
