On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:05:35AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +0000, Adam Majer wrote: > > [snip] > >> If someone is MIA, then instead of just taking over one package, you > >> should O: all of their packages AFAIK. > > > Hrm. Well, a check over the bug list does show that Moshe has not > > responded to any bugs since 14 May 2003. He hasn't been seen by > > db.debian.org at all recently. And, he's got unacknowledged NMUs for > > roughly half his packages. I guess that meets my definition of MIA. > > > Anyone disagree? > > > Moshe, here's the way it's going to go: if I don't hear from you within > > about two weeks (let's say 13 May, since I may be at a BSP that weekend) > > I will orphan all of your packages, setting the maintainer to the Debian > [...] > > Please don't do that. See developers reference 7.4 for how to handle > this properly. You should not orphan the packages yourself but gather > all the necessary information and forward it to -qa, where tbm usually > answers almost instantly to this type of questions.
Fine, CC'd -qa; I'll let it up to them and proceed with my original plans. All I really care about is epydoc; if someone else wants to go throught the hassle of filing all of the bugs and uploading all of the packages, I guess I'll let them. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpKRn8cR9UAG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
