* Josh Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040130 22:40]: > I am interested in helping out with QA work in Debian, and I have a couple of > questions related to bug triaging. I've looked at many of the bug reports > for nedit, which was just taken over by the Debian QA Group, so I will use it > to illustrate my questions:
Well, more or less like any other package that you maintain. > 1) When I find an old bug that looks like it wasn't ever a problem in the > package, what should I do? (See #103330 - > 2 years old, looks like a busted > X install was at fault) - Do I close it? Tag it moreinfo, then wait a while? > In this special case I'd more likly tag it "unreproducible", but "moreinfo" is also ok. > If so, how long? I'd wait for a month, and then close it. (Well, not exactly a month, but next time I look at it after the month.) > 2) What to do with a bug that the reporter says works now? (#131659, #113054 > - > this one worked with XFree86 4.x, just not 3.x) In 131659 is: "Feel free to close this bug.". So, just do it. > 3) Old bugs that have been fixed but never closed? (#94612, #96453) If they're really fixed, than close. However, a bug tagged "security" should IMHO be double checked that it's really fixed, and that it's fixed in all releases (woody and sid). > 4) Old bugs that were a problem with an old version of some other package, but > never got reassigned? (#68396, #117902 - lesstif1 bugs - but now nedit > statically links against a new version of lesstif1, #151039, #171302 - > gnome-terminal bugs, but a much newer version is in unstable) Do I reassign > them now? Close them? Tag them moreinfo and wait? Try to reproduce. If not reproducible, tag them so. Rest see above. > 5) For bugs I have tagged more info, and I don't think are a problem with > nedit, how long do I wait before closing them? (#151039, #171302 - tagged a > month ago, with no feedback) 1 month is IMHO usually enough. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
