* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040128 19:10]: > Andreas Barth wrote: > >I want to support this. For example, the discussion about the total > >removal of rocks-n-diamonds is not even one week old. So, I'd like to > >wait just a bit.
> Following a very long background, including long-standing consensus that the > current version of the package should not be released in any version of > Debian. > > We've got to do something sometime. If a new, DFSG-free rocks-n-diamongs > package gets uploaded, it can always go through the NEW queue. Of course. However, if you look at the qa-list, you might notice that the last mail in the thread was: | In this case, I'd say we should reassign this RC-bug to ftp.d.o and | ask for removal. If no-one stands up until the end of the week, I'll | do that. So, action was already settled at the time of your mail. I personally don't see what's opposing to wait these extra four days (counting from yesterday). And IMHO it's a good thing to wait just a few days, because not everyone reads mail multiple times a day. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
