On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:37:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Why? Typical candidates for volatile break because crucial data needs > permanent upgrades, which may require new upstream versions of shipped > libraries. This is not the case with Bugzilla; if new security issues > arise fixes need to be backported like every other security vulnerability > as well. I see no blocker in Bugzilla's software structure to be shipped > with Sarge, besides that it hasn't been maintained for a while.
That was the sense of 'eventually' :) If security upgrades were a pain that is a possibility to consider as last resort. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
