* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030722 11:05]: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:51:07PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Unfortunately the qa.d.o web site isn't maintained that well, but > > there are some things listed there. There isn't currently much > > coordination, so just just working on something you think is > > important, such as checking RC bug, submitting patches to bug reports, > > trying to reproduce really old bugs, etc. There's lot of work that > > can be done.
> While browsing through the qa pages I saw that quite a few orphaned > packages are been removed last week from unstable. Can the WNPP bugs > be closed or is there a reason they're still open? Oh, you're also working on the list of orphaned packages. That was also on my to-do-list, but it didn't get through to the top of my list. What seems important to me: To tag any of the bugs of the removed packages as "woody" or close them, whatever is appropriate. Are you also going through the list of long-living-bugs which packages should be orphaned? And through the list of orphaned packages which of them should be removed? (That are the two parts of wnpp / the package list that IMHO also need some cleaning up.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
