Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:15:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qa.debian.org: outdated link to debian-policy in debcheck
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 20:59:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 24 14:59:28 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from u212-239-160-76.adsl.pi.be (addie.lashout.net) [212.239.160.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xZ2V-0006Da-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:59:27 -0600
Received: from addie.lashout.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by addie.lashout.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id
h2OKxJWt004016;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:59:21 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by addie.lashout.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) id h2OKxIRU004015;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:59:18 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adriaan Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: outdated link to debian-policy in debcheck
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:59:18 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-24
Severity: normal
The link to the Debian Policy "Section 2.2: Priorities" is outdated,
current link:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch2.html#s2.2
this should be:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s2.2
Example can be found on
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=request-tracker
Adriaan
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux addie 2.4.20 #5 Tue Jan 28 02:34:54 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 186149-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 09:17:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 04:15:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eWlC-0001Ft-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:15:10 -0500
Received: from host217-39-22-88.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.39.22.88]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by protactinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 19eWlA-00044w-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:15:08 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 19eWlA-0006eW-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:15:08 +0100
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:15:08 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qa.debian.org: outdated link to debian-policy in debcheck
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:59:18PM +0100, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-24
> Severity: normal
>
> The link to the Debian Policy "Section 2.2: Priorities" is outdated,
> current link:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch2.html#s2.2
> this should be:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s2.2
>
> Example can be found on
> http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=request-tracker
Fixed in CVS, thanks (the links had changed since your bug report,
even). The results will become visible within a day or so.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
