Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:54:21PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >> Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] >> Read fontconfig documentation ? >> Search with Google why AA are slow ? > > AA ? Ascii Art ?! Are you living on another planet ? > What would that to do with fontconfig ? I had a terminal emulator See the gnome-terminal dependency, why I'm talking about fontconfig and and think the package name fontconfig is explicit. > that worked correctly, now it does not any more, and I'm apparently > not using any strange font... How is it that most developpers happen > to help people to track problems, when some others mostly answer "read > all the internet, you'll find the answer" ? I'm just saying that this is not a bug but a configuration issue. > And did you yourself try to run some command like "ldd > /usr/bin/gnome-terminal" in screen in a gnome-terminal ? And compare > that to the same within screen within an xterm ? The former takes > more than 3 seconds of wallclock ("time" is not taking the display > time into account, don't bother using it). Reminds me of the 8086 > preformance when running "DIR" on a floppy disk. Again no, I did a "tree /var" under a normal gnome-tterminal and under screen; and I do'n t see any difference. [...] >> Try to changes the gnome-terminal font ? > > Now that's something a bit more constructive. After one hour of > otherwise sterile debates :( Since the beginning I said that. [...] > Guess what ? 99% of them are proportional, which makes them totally > useless on a terminal emulator. Should I file a new bug ? Or would > it closed directly for any obscure reason ? Should I add font packages for you ? [...] >> try to disable font paths in fontconfig configuration ? > > Disable what ? > > $ cat /etc/fonts/local.conf > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> > <!-- /etc/fonts/local.conf file for local customizations --> > <fontconfig> > </fontconfig> Wrong file. > After running "dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig" I now have a single line. > Not sure that will help however. May be you need to do a ls /etc/fonts ? $ ls /etc/fonts fonts.conf fonts.dtd local.conf local.conf.old and read other files ? [...] >> > It looks like many people are being pissed off by such an aggressive >> > behaviour. This is going against the quality of the distribution. >> > Hence the CC of this mail. >> >> Who is exactly agressive ? you ? > > The one who is so convinced there is no bug in _HIS_ package that he > pisses off bug reporters without an explanation ? The one who has to > be asked 4 times by different packages before starting to enlighten > the lowly users about why their bug was closed ? Just guess... I've already saying 4 times that this bug is a configuration issue. Your attitude is also unacceptable, you have reopened this bug without any search on your configuration what wrong. Christian