Your message dated Wed, 9 Apr 2003 00:33:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#188126: qa.debian.org: Wrong link to bugs for packages
containing "+"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2003 06:01:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 08 01:01:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-84-238-144.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.238.144]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 192mAv-0005Ak-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 01:01:41 -0500
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 192mAp-0000Nt-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 08:01:35 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:01:35 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: Wrong link to bugs for packages containing "+"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
Sender: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-08
Severity: normal
Example: gtk+2.0, at http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html.
The links in the "Bugs Count" panel are OK, but the link in the
"Testing Status", "gtk+2.0 (source) is buggy! (1 > 0)" doesn't work:
The "+" in the package name in the URL gets interpreted as a space,
and thus the BTS looks for a package "gtk 2.0". The + should be
encoded as "%2B".
There may be other such problematic characters.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tofu 2.4.20-usagi #1 lun mar 31 17:18:21 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188126-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2003 22:34:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 08 17:34:06 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1931fK-0001W0-00; Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:34:06 -0500
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2E85DEB43D; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 00:33:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 00:33:35 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#188126: qa.debian.org: Wrong link to bugs for packages
containing "+"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Le Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 08:01:35AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane écrivait:
> The links in the "Bugs Count" panel are OK, but the link in the
> "Testing Status", "gtk+2.0 (source) is buggy! (1 > 0)" doesn't work:
> The "+" in the package name in the URL gets interpreted as a space,
> and thus the BTS looks for a package "gtk 2.0". The + should be
> encoded as "%2B".
This is the fault of the testing scripts which are putting wrong URLs in
the update_excuses files ... but I have added a bit of code to avoid this
problem.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
