Your message dated Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:33:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#182031: developer.php: link to buildd reports sometime
wrong/not senseful in contrib/non-free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2003 13:35:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 22 07:35:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ping-ef-gw.ping.de (noefs.ping.de) [62.72.90.14] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mZol-0001Ko-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:35:52 -0600
Received: from [10.11.11.81] (helo=stan.ping.de)
by noefs.ping.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18mZoi-00063B-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:35:48 +0100
Received: by stan.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D9CAF774F3; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:35:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:35:06 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: developer.php: link to buildd reports sometime wrong/not senseful in
contrib/non-free
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-22
Severity: normal=20
Hi,
please look at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Drene.
openoffice.org-debian-files and openoffice.org-spellcheck-de
are complete binary-independent (Arch: all) so they should have a "-" in the
Buildd column.
Moreover, I just looked on something at
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Djoeyh and saw that there is a
Buildd entry on Joey's non-free dgen package. IIRC non-free isn't
autobuild do that doesn't make any sense too...
Regards,
Rene
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stan 2.4.18 #1 Son Nov 3 01:29:12 CET 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=20
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+V3yK+FmQsCSK63MRAllbAJ9qy+OvvlTnUwcfF+k87TqQ7/QlGgCdEzOp
34c8YmJahHahTieskhcCW+c=
=bboE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182031-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2003 11:33:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 05:33:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.abo.wanadoo.fr (tass.genibel.org)
[193.251.11.120]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xmgZ-0006CK-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 05:33:43 -0600
Received: from igor by tass.genibel.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18xmg6-0005G7-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:33:14 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:33:14 +0100
From: Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#182031: developer.php: link to buildd reports sometime
wrong/not senseful in contrib/non-free
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:35:06PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi Rene,
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-22
> Severity: normal=20
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> please look at http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Drene.
>=20
> openoffice.org-debian-files and openoffice.org-spellcheck-de
> are complete binary-independent (Arch: all) so they should have a "-" in =
the
> Buildd column.
>=20
> Moreover, I just looked on something at
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Djoeyh and saw that there is a
> Buildd entry on Joey's non-free dgen package. IIRC non-free isn't
> autobuild do that doesn't make any sense too...
I released a new version of developer.php that fixes this bug.
Cheers.
--=20
Igor Genibel=20
http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tuxfamily.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+gD56xEsCZp1zW08RAieYAKDFt2uMaFXxu80wRpjfPUGbDb0pOQCgydcm
WKOMnmOhbTkJ1/0eTuV7i9M=
=V3CB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC--
