Your message dated Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:23:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166527: developer.php: not picking up package that exists
only in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2002 21:33:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 26 16:33:06 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 185YYK-0007Us-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:33:04 -0500
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 185YYC-0007Pw-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:32:56 +0200
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:32:56 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: developer.php: not picking up package that exists only in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.8
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel
2.4.20-pre11-freeswan1.98b-evms1.2.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=5.0
tests=NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-26
Severity: normal
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
generates an incomplete overview of my packages: it does not list libgsf
(http://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgsf.html). Most likely this has to do
with libgsf only existing in experimental.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zensunni 2.4.20-pre11-freeswan1.98b-evms1.2.0 #1 SMP Wed Oct =
16 08:14:27 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.ISO8859-1
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166527-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2003 11:23:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 05:23:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atoulouse-201-2-1-120.abo.wanadoo.fr (tass.genibel.org)
[193.251.11.120]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18xmX7-0004mZ-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 05:23:57 -0600
Received: from igor by tass.genibel.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18xmWT-0005Dq-00; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:23:17 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:23:17 +0100
From: Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#166527: developer.php: not picking up package that exists only
in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:11:35AM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote:
Hi,
> Unfortunately, at the moment, the packages list is only built refering
> developer's packages in unstable. So if you have severtal package only
> in experimental, ddpo could not show you their status... :-/
> I know it is not useful but I'm working on a complete rewrite in order
> to consider these cases.
I released a new version of developer.php that fixes this bug. Now, you
can find experimental only packages (for example: coda packages
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=3Dcoda )
Cheers.
--=20
Igor Genibel=20
http://www.answare.fr/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tuxfamily.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.debian.org/~igenibel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 1024D/9D735B4F: 4F61 8D8F 05AC 8D2C 5F92 9B99 C44B 0266 9D73 5B4F
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+gDwlxEsCZp1zW08RAoFBAKCm5N0oYON69rau8BL/XpHTWmicKwCguZWJ
Bn2m8uJFmVucJkPduCIRtII=
=LhoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--
