Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:24:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183673: qa.debian.org: PTS could display the
architecture(s) of each binary package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2003 16:59:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 06 10:59:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (smtp-out.fr.alcove.com) [81.80.245.157]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18qyiK-0005KV-00; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:59:24 -0600
Received: from vitel.alcove-fr ([10.16.10.8])
by smtp-out.fr.alcove.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 18qyhj-0006QK-00; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:58:47 +0100
Received: from ydirson by vitel.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18qyhn-0002se-00; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:58:51 +0100
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:58:51 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: PTS could display the architecture(s) of each binary
package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-03-06
Severity: wishlist
That is, for each binary package, the Architecture: field from
debian/control in the source package. This would make it far easier
to know if a given package is built for a given architecture, thus
making easier to maintainers to support archs they don't have access
to.
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Développeur Debian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 183673-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 20:25:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 14:25:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tZGK-00039S-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:25:12 -0600
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0A895EB6D6; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:24:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 21:24:41 +0100
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#183673: qa.debian.org: PTS could display the architecture(s)
of each binary package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Le Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:23:39PM +0100, Yann Dirson écrivait:
> > Second, most packages have "any" or "all", so the information is rather
> > not very interesting.
> [...]
> > I'm tempted however to display the global "architecture" field of the
> > source if it is different from "any" or "all" ... that way you'll notice
> > that efibootmgr is ia64-specific and the like.
>
> This sounds like a good solution.
Done. The changes will appear in a few hours.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
