On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:09:20AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:09:56PM -0800, Micah Anderson ?crivait: > > Hello, I sent the following to the manages alias and it bounced back with > > the following error... might want to get this fixed, or should I be sending > > mail to another address? I have another package to remove from the needs > > manpage list. > > This does mean that the alias "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" doesn't exist and > that the mail has been treated by the default fallback program (which is > mia-record). > > The correct alias is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (as documented) ... > > Maybe we should setup a second alias for convenience.
I agree. Done. > > > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:57:14 -0800 > > > From: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Remove mutt-utf8 from list > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > mutt-utf8 is listed on http://qa-debian.org/man-pages.html as not having > > > the > > > man page for the binary "mutt". This should be removed from the page > > > because > > > the man page for this package is included in the dependant package "mutt". > > > You don't install mutt-utf without getting the "mutt" package, which > > > includes the mutt man page, this is how it is intended, and should be > > > removed from the list of binaries which need man pages. http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. This is a lintian false positive, and probably one that can't be worked around in lintian. However, if the maintainer of mutt-utf8 would add a lintian override for that error, it would disappear from the QA web pages automatically. I've cc'ed Marco to see what he thinks. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
