Your message dated Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:27:07 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#173275: qa.debian.org: still lots of commands without man
pages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2002 07:44:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 16 01:44:18 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nk210-200-180-161.cl.fx.apol.com.tw (smtp.u2online.com.tw)
[210.200.180.161]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18NpvF-0006ju-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 01:44:18 -0600
Received: from debian (TC218-187-83-95.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw [218.187.83.95])
by smtp.u2online.com.tw (8.12.2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBG7kSDZ090528
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:46:31 +0800 (CST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18NkOI-0000hm-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:49:54 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: still lots of commands without man pages
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:49:54 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: **
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-16
Severity: wishlist
if a command doesn't have a man page, the best one can do is do a
risky $command --help to guess what it does. E.g. with lspgpot ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173275-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2002 10:27:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 16 04:27:09 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18NsSq-0005rF-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 04:27:08 -0600
Received: from host217-35-41-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.41.25]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16)
id 18NsSp-0006LG-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:27:07 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 18NsSp-0004Yl-00; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:27:07 +0000
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:27:07 +0000
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#173275: qa.debian.org: still lots of commands without man pages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.7 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:49:54AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-16
> Severity: wishlist
qa.debian.org is for the qa.debian.org web site and related systems, not
your general bugs.
> if a command doesn't have a man page, the best one can do is do a
> risky $command --help to guess what it does. E.g. with lspgpot ...
PLEASE file bugs against individual packages here. A general bug on this
is useless, as it can basically never be closed. Bugs against individual
packages might cause something to happen.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
