While looking for a TrueType font suitable for use in tuxpaint (to replace
the proprietary chicago.ttf font currently in the package) I tried this:
apt-file search '\.ttf'
I found quite a number of packages with .ttf files in them.
At random, I picked hatman and checked it out. It has two fonts, and this
is what I found about them:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/hatman/fonts$ strings casual.ttf | grep -i
copyright
Copyright (c) 1992 Corel Corporation. All Rights
Reserved.FrankensteinRegularFrankenstein
PlainFrankenstein001.003FrankensteinPlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/hatman/fonts$ strings menu.ttf | grep -i copyright
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/hatman/fonts$
The "all rights reserved" does not bode well. Also, who knows where
menu.ttf came from, as it has no copyright notice.
Well, let's look at another, mangoquest-data
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/mangopeeler/fonts$ strings font.ttf | grep -i
copyright
JDigitized data copyright (C) 1991-1996 The Monotype Corporation. All rights
reserved. Impact is a trademark of Stephenson Blake (Holdings)
Ltd.ImpactRegularImpact - 1992ImpactVersion 2.30ImpactImpact is a trademark
of Stephenson Blake (Holdings) Ltd.
This is not looking good. So, how widespread is this problem? Shouldn't
each and every package containing a .ttf be examined and bugs filed based on
these findings?
Ben
--
nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]
