On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 12:49:44AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:40:16PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > Sigh, I didn't realize full runs were broken too. > > Yeah. The current results on l.d.o show: > > Maintainers listed: 728 (+0) > Source packages listed: 3358 (+0) > Binary packages listed: 2446 (+0)
Oh, right. I assumed that was the result of a broken incremental run and ignored it. > > Am I likely to be able to reproduce this with a binary-only archive, so I > > can experiment on my laptop rather than on master? > > I don't know, I haven't looked into it. (One reason is lack of time, the > other is lack of interest. <shrug>) I guess I'll add it to my New Year's resolutions, then. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
