Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libliteclue bugs fixed by QA uploads
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2001 02:54:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 23 21:54:34 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14rsyI-0005Ku-00; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:54:34 -0500
Received: (qmail 23254 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2001 02:54:25 -0000
Received: from aph.frognet.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2001 02:54:25 -0000
Received: from dns1.stderr.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with
ESMTP id f3O2sRGc017946;
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:54:27 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by dns1.stderr.org (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id
f3O2sRme017945;
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:54:27 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:54:27 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: elijah wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libliteclue-dev: conflicting files with old package; same as earlier
bug.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libliteclue-dev
Version: 1.2.16-1
Severity: important
Unpacking replacement libliteclue-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libliteclue-dev_1.2.16-1.2_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/lib/libLiteClue.so', which is also in package
libliteclue
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libliteclue-dev_1.2.16-1.2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dns1 2.4.2-686 #1 Mon Mar 12 05:57:25 EST 2001 i686
unknown
Versions of the packages libliteclue-dev depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libliteclue 1.2.16-1 "balloon help" Widget library - runtime
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95066-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2001 13:26:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 02 08:26:54 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mccoy.flatline.org.uk) [::ffff:195.8.181.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15SIV4-0002dN-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:26:54 -0500
Received: from cjw44 by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15SIV3-0003IT-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:26:53 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libliteclue bugs fixed by QA uploads
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libliteclue is orphaned, and these bugs were fixed by QA Group uploads
some time ago. As such, I'm closing them now.
libliteclue (1.2.16-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
* The 'renaming sucks' release
* Aargh. libliteclue-dev should conflict with libliteclue
too. (Closes: Bug#95066)
-- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:00:17 +0200
libliteclue (1.2.16-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Conflict with old libliteclue (Closes: Bug#94982)
-- Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:47:33 +0200
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
