Your message dated Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:21:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gap bugs fixed by QA upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 1999 03:55:11 +0000
Received: (qmail 21618 invoked from network); 5 Sep 1999 03:55:10 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO kitenet.net)
(63.193.116.241)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 1999 03:55:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 2882 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 1999 03:55:01 -0000
Date: 5 Sep 1999 03:55:01 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: this package is not native
Package: gap
Version: debian unstable as of 4 Sep 99
It seems that gap is not really a debian native package; examination
of the copyright file shows that the sources for it were obtained from
elsewhere, not written by a debian developer. And yet, in the debian
archive, there is only a gap.tar.gz, not a gap.orig.tar.gz.
Any package that's not a native package is supposed to have a .orig.tar.gz
file and an accompanying .diff.gz file that contains any debian changes.
(See section 3.3 of the policy manual for details.) This has a number of
benefits, including letting people see what changes were made for debian,
and making it easy to apply those changes to new upstream versions of the
package.
Please download the pristine upstream source of gap, and use it to
create a .orig.tar.gz file, and then rebuild your package with
"dpkg-buildpackage -sa" so that the .orig.tar.gz file will be uploaded to
the debian archive.
(I realize there might be situtations where doing that is not possible, or I
may have misidentified your package as having this problem when it is really
a native package. If so, simply close this semi-autogenerated bug report.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 44338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2001 13:21:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 02 08:21:03 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mccoy.flatline.org.uk) [::ffff:195.8.181.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15SIPO-0002WA-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:21:02 -0500
Received: from cjw44 by mccoy.flatline.org.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15SIPN-0003GQ-00; Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:21:01 +0100
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:21:01 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gap bugs fixed by QA upload
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gap is now maintained by the Debian QA Group, but before it was orphaned
there was a non-maintainer upload which set some bugs to 'fixed'. I'm
closing those bugs now.
gap (3.4.4-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
* NMU (Closes: #44338)
* Made the FSSTND -> FHS transition. (Closes: #91161, #91468)
* Upped Standards-Version to 3.5.2.
-- Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:24:51 -0400
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
