Le Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > Basically, I tried to come up with what a QA committee could actually > do. And, well, I couldn't find anything. So I suggest to officially > close the committee down. However, perhaps not coming up with good > ideas was only a lack of my imagination. If you have any good ideas > why we need a QA committee, let me know.
The QA committed had several goals at the beginning : - coordinating the effort (unfortunately since very few people work on QA we don't neede much coordination) - taking final decision when we have to orphan a package or when an NMU is required but the usual rules have not been followed Again, here you're doing well for the first part with your MIA database and the second part is not a big deal since very few NMUs are problematic (even official rules are not always followed (particularly about the amount of time to wait)). So, I agree, let's close the QA committe. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/ Le bouche à oreille du Net : http://www.beetell.com Naviguer sans se fatiguer à chercher : http://www.deenoo.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
