Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2001 22:47:23 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in python-gendoc 0.73-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2001 15:05:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 01 10:05:34 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from corinth.st.hmc.edu [134.173.59.58] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14ubiX-0001ew-00; Tue, 01 May 2001 10:05:33 -0500
Received: by corinth.st.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 7CFEC2FD2C; Tue,  1 May 2001 08:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 08:05:31 -0700
From: Michael Vrable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Typo in python-gendoc prerm Script
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: python-gendoc
Version: 0.73-4

The prerm script contains a typo on line 8.  It reads
  PACKAGE=`basename .prerm`
while instead it should read
  PACKAGE=`basename $0 .prerm`

This causes the following error messages on uninstallation:
  Package `.prerm' is not installed.
  Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
  and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
  Package `.prerm' is not installed.
  Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
  and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.

Compiled python files are not properly removed as a result.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95954-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2001 20:49:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 24 15:49:09 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 15322e-0001zi-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:49:09 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02644
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 May 2001 22:47:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA20637;
        Thu, 24 May 2001 22:47:23 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 22:47:23 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in python-gendoc 0.73-5
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

fixed in python-gendoc 0.73-5

Reply via email to