Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2001 18:16:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in apsfilter 6.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2001 10:20:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 05:20:30 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14sMPO-000676-00; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 05:20:30 -0500
Received: (qmail 18112 invoked by uid 0); 25 Apr 2001 10:19:58 -0000
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:19:58 +0200 (MEST)
From: Alexander Bluhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: apsfilter install fails without printcap
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authenticated-IP: [212.9.183.33]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: apsfilter
Version: 5.1.4-1

The apsfilter install script fails if /etc/printcap does not exist.
As apsfilter creates /etc/printcap it should be no problem if it
is missing.

apt-get output:
Unpacking apsfilter (from .../apsfilter_5.1.4-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up apsfilter (5.1.4-1) ...
grep: /etc/printcap: No such file or directory
/var/lib/dpkg/info/apsfilter.postinst: [: too many arguments

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 95199-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2001 16:09:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 12 11:09:27 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14ybxO-0007eW-00; Sat, 12 May 2001 11:09:26 -0500
Received: from om (asy103.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.128.103])
        by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA17263
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 May 2001 18:09:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mvela by om with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14yc43-0000I4-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 May 2001 18:16:19 +0200
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 18:16:15 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in apsfilter 6.0.0-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Accept-Language: en, hr
Sender: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Here is the relevant changelog entry:

  apsfilter (6.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
  [...]
    * Handle systems where there is no /etc/printcap.  Closes: Bug#70943.
  [...]
   -- Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed,  3 Jan 2001 16:06:40 +0100


Thanks,

Matej

Reply via email to