Your message dated Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 06:54:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 00:54:27 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c1494421-a.alntn1.tx.home.com (localhost) [24.4.56.213]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14hQtX-00024m-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:54:27 -0600
Received: from adam by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14hQrF-0003rl-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:52:05 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package dpkg-mountable still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:52:05 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg-mountable
Version: 0.8, as in unstable on March 24
According to the Contents file for unstable, dpkg-mountable contains
at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and
policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in
/usr/share/doc/ instead.
Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant documentation
location so woody can ship with its documentation in a consistent,
FHS compliant state. Thank you.
[ This bug report was automatically generated. ]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 91423-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2001 13:36:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 08:36:40 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14rK2Y-0002v2-00; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:38 -0500
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194])
by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA21428;
Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:36:23 -0500
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 38987229CF; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:36:49 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dpkg-mountable removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dpkg-mountable has been removed from Debian unstable and won't be
released with the next official release of Debian, codenamed "woody".
The original maintainer writes:
| * I can no longer test new versions of this package, as I'm using
| apt-zip rather than my not-free dialup access. I wrote it when I
| was accessing the University's NFS archive mirror!
|
| * It's slightly buggy, and badly out-of-date policy-wise.
|
| * Apt now provides (AFAIK) all the features provided by
| dpkg-mountable, and some (such as package ordering) that it never
| got around to getting.
Please switch to apt.
If you have questions about this, please contact me.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
