Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:37:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#91072: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2001 00:02:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 24 18:02:50 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [198.144.200.155] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14gxze-0007Rg-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 18:02:50 -0600
Received: by kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 500)
id A1004BC079; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:02:25 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:02:25 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: saml
Version: as in unstable on March 24th
According to the Contents file for unstable, saml contains
at least one file in /usr/man/. That directory is deprecated,
and policy says that packages should place man pages in /usr/share/man/
instead.
Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant manual page
location so woody can ship with its man pages in a consistent, FHS
compliant state. Thank you.
[ This bug report was automatically generated. ]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 91072-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 16:29:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 10:29:56 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14hZsR-00062F-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:29:55 -0600
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([62.253.132.58]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:29:53 +0100
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 14hZzg-0006VU-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:37:24 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#91072: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:37:24 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) wrote:
>Package: saml
>Version: as in unstable on March 24th
>
>According to the Contents file for unstable, saml contains
>at least one file in /usr/man/. That directory is deprecated,
>and policy says that packages should place man pages in /usr/share/man/
>instead.
Fixed in the QA upload 970418-6:
saml (970418-6) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Update to policy version 3.1.1:
- FHS updates (closes: #80767).
[...]
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 22 Mar 2001 01:47:49 +0000
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
