Your message dated Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:25:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#91421: Package dotfile-doc still has at least one file in
/usr/doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 06:54:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 00:54:26 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c1494421-a.alntn1.tx.home.com (localhost) [24.4.56.213]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14hQtW-00024K-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:54:26 -0600
Received: from adam by localhost with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14hQrE-0003rf-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:52:04 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package dotfile-doc still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:52:04 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dotfile-doc
Version: 20010324-1, as in unstable on March 24
According to the Contents file for unstable, dotfile-doc contains at least
one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section
13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/
instead.
Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant documentation
location so woody can ship with its documentation in a consistent,
FHS compliant state. Thank you.
[ This bug report was automatically generated. ]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 91421-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 08:25:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 26 02:25:25 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (mvela)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14hSJY-0002Vp-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:25:24 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id KAA08898
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:25:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:25:13 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#91421: Package dotfile-doc still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Adam Heath on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at
12:52:04AM -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:52:04AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Package: dotfile-doc
> Version: 20010324-1, as in unstable on March 24
>
> According to the Contents file for unstable, dotfile-doc contains at least
> one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section
> 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/
> instead.
>
> Please update your package soon to use the FHS compliant documentation
> location so woody can ship with its documentation in a consistent,
> FHS compliant state. Thank you.
Contents is stale; dotfile-doc 20010324-1 (installed on Saturday) is FHS
compliant.
Thanks,
Matej
