Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:51:58 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#75985: bot should forward orphans to wnpp (was: Orphaning 
some packages)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2000 21:49:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 15:49:12 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chill.frosty-geek.net [::ffff:194.97.55.38] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13qjHM-0001F3-00; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:49:12 -0600
Received: by chill.frosty-geek.net (Postfix+IPv6, from userid 10)
        id AB75B11E7F; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:49:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id AC99E38D4E; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:42:46 +0100
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bot should forward orphans to wnpp (was: Orphaning some packages)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 
at 02:12:23 +0100
X-PGP: 1024R/D1A3A329 BB A2 DC FE D7 D2 09 BF  93 46 36 6F C1 A4 41 1A
X-GPG: 1024D/94C09C7F 5B00 C96D 5D54 AEE1 206B  AF84 DE7A AF6E 94C0
X-PGP-Comment: 0xD8C141C8 is a low security key - http://www.noreply.org/pgp/
X-Accept-Language: de, en
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: qa.debian.org
Version: 20001031
Severity: wishlist

The bot that handles [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also file bugs against
wnpp if someone issues one of those commands (or instruct the author of
a command to manipulate bugs (him|her)self):

 http://qa.debian.org/bot-quickref.html:
[..]
|  The following commands are understood by the QA-Bot at
|  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[..]
|    * For Package Maintainers
|       
|             helpme <package> [{yes|no|true|false|1|0}]
|                     Declare that you need some kind of help with
|                     <package> (or if false, that you no longer do).
|                     When this is true, QA people will investigate your
|                     package via the Bug Tracking System and try to
|                     offer help. If you need help for a very specific
|                     task you may want to contact the QA committee so
|                     that they create a new task that will appear in the
|                     task list.
|                     
|             orphan <package> [{yes|no|true|false|1|0}]
|                     Declare that you are no longer maintaining
|                     <package> (or if false, that you are adopting it or
|                     taking it back). Don't forget to upload the package
|                     with <AB> Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
|                     <BB> as maintainer field when you orphan a package.
|                     
|             adopt <package>
|                     Declare that you are taking over (adopting)
|                     <package>.
[...]


Hi Wichert!

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> orphan xcdroast
> orphan et
> orphan gtoaster
> thanks

You should probably also file bugs against wnpp.

-- 
Peter


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75985-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2001 23:50:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 25 17:50:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [::ffff:64.240.156.194] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14XAvh-00066a-00; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:50:17 -0600
Received: from fisch.cyrius.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [64.240.156.194])
        by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA23967;
        Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:50:15 -0600
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 305A322A83; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:51:58 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:51:58 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#75985: bot should forward orphans to wnpp (was: Orphaning some 
packages)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 
at 10:42:46PM +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20001031 22:42]:
>  http://qa.debian.org/bot-quickref.html:
> [..]
> |             orphan <package> [{yes|no|true|false|1|0}]
> |                     Declare that you are no longer maintaining
> |                     <package> (or if false, that you are adopting it or
> |                     taking it back). Don't forget to upload the package
> |                     with <AB> Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
> |                     <BB> as maintainer field when you orphan a package.

The docs no longer say that, closing your bug.

They say:

      Note that you can orphan and adopt packages using the WNPP.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to