Your message dated Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:47:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fw: xwpe showing wrong line numbers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2000 09:58:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 05 03:58:32 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ftoomsh.progsoc.uts.edu.au (ftoomsh) [::ffff:138.25.6.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13sMZI-0002c0-00; Sun, 05 Nov 2000 03:58:30 -0600
Received: (from localhost user: 'wildfire', uid#10083)
by ftoomsh.progsoc.uts.edu.au id <S155919AbQKEJ6D>;
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:58:03 +1100
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([216.234.231.6]:2984 "HELO murphy.debian.org")
by ftoomsh.progsoc.uts.edu.au with SMTP id <S156005AbQKDVry>;
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:47:54 +1100
Received: (qmail 17574 invoked by uid 38); 4 Nov 2000 21:47:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 17566 invoked by uid 38); 4 Nov 2000 21:47:49 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MBOX-Line: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 4 15:47:49 2000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 17550 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2000 21:47:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.citiz.net) (202.109.72.195)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2000 21:47:49 -0000
Received: (mail 82953 invoked by uid 0); 4 Nov 2000 21:54:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO a.online.sh.cn) (61.129.176.20)
by mail2.citiz.net with SMTP; 4 Nov 2000 21:54:17 -0000
From: "a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 05:48:31 +0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1157
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=CN-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Diagnostic: False posting to debian-bugs
X-Diagnostic: Assuming spam
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Orcpt: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 20:58:03 +1100
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xwpe
Version: 1.4.2-2.1
i use xwpe to open /debian/main/binary-i386/Packages on my Debian 2.0 CD
and locate the following line:
Package: dotfile-doc
xwpe shows that it's on 4876th line. However edit.com of Win95 says it is
on 4875th line. i know M$ is right because i write an editor for Linux and
it agree with
M$.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 76285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2000 10:48:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 24 04:48:06 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (mvela)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14A8hB-00058J-00; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 04:48:05 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.0/8.9.0) id LAA12508;
Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:47:57 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:47:57 +0100
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dennis Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: xwpe showing wrong line numbers
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Dennis Payne on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at
10:46:22PM -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 10:46:22PM -0500, Dennis Payne wrote:
> Yes this occurs but it isn't exactly a bug. In the editor options there
> is a "Max. Columns" item. If a line is longer than this it will wrap
> the line and therefore throw off the line number.
>
> Personally I don't like the behavior and suggested on the xwpe list
> that a 'no-wrap' mode be created. Most users didn't see this as a
> problem so I've never bothered to implemented it.
>
> Current suggestion is to set the "Max. Columns" to a larger value like
> 300.
I'll close this bug report then.
Merry Christmas!
Matej
