Your message dated Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:24:50 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug#45020: lockvc not unlocking vc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 1999 17:59:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 5047 invoked from network); 13 Sep 1999 17:59:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailsrv.nu.edu.ph) (202.138.131.68)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Sep 1999 17:59:22 -0000
Received: from 202.138.131.70 ([202.138.131.70]) by mailsrv.nu.edu.ph with SMTP 
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3)
        id S4VSQBPM; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 02:00:21 +0100
Received: (qmail 363 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Sep 1999 14:24:44 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "k e c h i e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lockvc not unlocking vc
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.27
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:24:44 +0800

Package: lockvc
Version: 3.4-2
Severity: important

lockvc could not unlock my vc even if I enter the root passwd.
That's all

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux etok 2.2.9 #12 Sat Sep 11 23:24:58 PHT 1999 i586

Versions of packages lockvc depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.1.2-1    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-pwdb                   0.69-2     PAM module to enable libpwdb (Pass
ii  libpam0g                      0.69-2     Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  svgalibg1                     1:1.4.0-1  SVGA display utilities            

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/pam.d/lockvc removed

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45020-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2000 23:18:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 10 17:18:48 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from web1.lanscape.net [64.240.156.194] (root)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 145Fk0-00058M-00; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:18:48 -0600
Received: from sumpf.cyrius.com (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [64.240.156.194])
        by web1.lanscape.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09803
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:18:47 -0600
Received: by sumpf.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id C3A121527A; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:24:50 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:24:50 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bug#45020: lockvc not unlocking vc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, Sep 11, 1999 
at 10:24:44PM +0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* k e c h i e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19990911 22:24]:
> lockvc could not unlock my vc even if I enter the root passwd.
> That's all
> 
> -- Configuration Files:
> /etc/pam.d/lockvc removed

I'm closing this bug because 1. e-mail to the submitter bounces and
2. because I assume he had deleted /etc/pam.d/lockvc by hand which
of course isn't a good thing to do.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to