Your message dated Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:52:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#70246: fixed in dfm 0.99.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2000 02:26:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 27 21:26:23 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (ngi.de) [::ffff:195.243.0.244]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13TEcw-0001yh-00; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:26:22 -0500
Received: (qmail 31236 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2000 02:26:19 -0000
Received: from p3e9e1487.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO dual.intern.brederlow.de)
(62.158.20.135)
by 195.243.0.244 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2000 02:26:19 -0000
Received: from mrvn by dual.intern.brederlow.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian))
id 13TMCS-0004Zg-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:31:32 +0200
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: automatic build fails for potato
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:31:32 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dfm
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-28
Severity: normal
*** explain.txt
I compiled all packages that have no "Build-Depends" in potato/main/Sources.gz.
Your package failed to build together with about 1700 other packages.
Since you have no "Build-Depends" you eigther forgot that your package
build-depends on something (like debhelper?) or you don't know about
build dependencies.
The releavnt fields are descibed in:
http://www.at.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/ch-relationships.html#s8.7
Please add build dependencies to your package or correct what ever else
caused the package not to build. If you already did so for woody, please
just close this bug report. If your Package is one of the rare cases with
a Build-Depends-Indep and I overlooked it, also please just close.
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
The compilation logfiles follows:
*** dfm/dfm.log
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 297kB of source archives.
Get:1 ftp://alpha potato/main dfm 0.99.3-1 (dsc) [827B]
Get:2 ftp://alpha potato/main dfm 0.99.3-1 (tar) [294kB]
Get:3 ftp://alpha potato/main dfm 0.99.3-1 (diff) [1927B]
Fetched 297kB in 0s (659kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting dfm in dfm-0.99.3
dpkg-source: extracting dfm in dfm-0.99.3
dpkg-source: extracting dfm in dfm-0.99.3
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is dfm
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.99.3-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debian/rules clean DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386 DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i386
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386
DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU=i386 DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127
Build command 'cd dfm-0.99.3 && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed.
E: Child process failed
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.2.17 #1 Sun Jun 25 09:24:41 EST 2000 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 70246-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2000 19:52:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 09 13:52:47 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 144q35-0000ml-00; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 13:52:47 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 144q31-0001Yp-00; Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:52:43 -0500
From: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#70246: fixed in dfm 0.99.7-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2000 14:52:43 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dfm, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dfm_0.99.7-1.dsc
to dists/woody/main/source/x11/dfm_0.99.7-1.dsc
replacing dfm_0.99.3-1.1.dsc
dfm_0.99.7-1_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/x11/dfm_0.99.7-1.deb
replacing dfm_0.99.3-1.1.deb
dfm_0.99.7.orig.tar.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/x11/dfm_0.99.7.orig.tar.gz
replacing dfm_0.99.3.orig.tar.gz
dfm_0.99.7-1.diff.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/x11/dfm_0.99.7-1.diff.gz
replacing dfm_0.99.3-1.1.diff.gz
Note that this package is not part of the released stable Debian
distribution. It may have dependencies on other unreleased software,
or other instabilities. Please take care if you wish to install it.
The update will eventually make its way into the next released Debian
distribution.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org> (supplier of updated dfm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:14:59 -0500
Source: dfm
Binary: dfm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dfm - The Desktop-File-Manager for X11
Closes: 67938 70246
Changes:
dfm (0.99.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream version (Closes: #67938)
* Build deps were added by Branden (Closes: #70246)
* Orphaned package - someone offered to take this I think, but never did
Files:
17a044816ea0995874ecaa304162c897 681 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-1.dsc
6717a24ec363d34d9a48607ff54763da 388745 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7.orig.tar.gz
e9b14e82069a416f31dc39f3636782a3 2280 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-1.diff.gz
837d3cfc4891acd164b279dd30069b0c 238012 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: The default gpg comment sucks! ;>
iEYEARECAAYFAjoyhckACgkQj/fXo9z52rNsaACfX+LUKDpW5uuUZHFZLRRKrfoH
N5QAn0oUwxurbXNLFW49h4/Q3g7xJyNu
=7vBw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
