Your message dated Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line There's already a libfnlib-dev package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 1999 12:31:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 9258 invoked from network); 23 Nov 1999 12:31:14 -0000
Received: from post-11.mail.nl.demon.net (HELO post.mail.nl.demon.net) 
(194.159.73.21)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 1999 12:31:14 -0000
Received: from [212.238.40.27] (helo=beneden)
        by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
        id 11qF6Q-0002un-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:31:22 +0000
Received: from pfv by beneden with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian))
        id 11qF4e-0000Aa-00; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:29:32 +0100
From: Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libfnlib0: devel package missing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:29:32 +0100

Package: libfnlib0
Version: 0.4-3
Severity: normal

There is no devel package which includes the .h files. So recompiling
enlightenment is not possible. There also seems to be a new upstream
release (0.5)


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux beneden 2.2.13 #3 Thu Oct 21 16:14:19 CEST 1999 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages libfnlib0 depends on:
hi  fnlib-data      0.4-3          Font files needed by Fnlib
hi  imlib1          1.9.8-2        Imlib is an imaging library for X and X11
hi  libc6           2.1.2-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
hi  libjpeg62       6b-1.2         The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime li
hi  libpng2         1.0.5-0.1      PNG library - runtime
hi  libtiff3g       3.5.2-1        TIFF runtime library
hi  libungif3g      3.0-2.1        shared library for GIF images (runtime lib)
hi  xlib6g          3.3.5-1        shared libraries required by X clients
hi  zlib1g          1.1.3-5        compression library - runtime
hi  libungif3g      3.0-2.1        shared library for GIF images (runtime lib)
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package giflib3g)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 51078-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2000 19:50:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 12 14:50:38 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [::ffff:129.187.176.79] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 13Yw4j-00055j-00; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:50:37 -0500
Received: (qmail 6996 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2000 19:50:36 -0000
Received: from gaia.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.73)
  by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 12 Sep 2000 19:50:35 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 21:50:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: There's already a libfnlib-dev package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There's already a libfnlib-dev package (at least in woody).

cu,
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi

Reply via email to