On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 01:36:55PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > 1. I agree the change from CMU to UCD snmp should have been better > documented. Perhaps the maintainer should have made it more obvious > by calling the UCD package "ucd-snmp", as he named the source package.
Perhaps. It's been my experience, though, that changing the package name just upsets a different set of users. In other words, it's a no win situation. > Since the maintainer (David Engel) didn't know it was going to be a > problem, I don't see how he'd do anything different. Correct. In fact, I didn't think people were using much more than snmpd. David -- David Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
