On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 06:12:34PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Did you bytecompile it, for this or a previous version?
> >
> > I'm not 100% sure. But I think I did say "yes" to the question if the
> > module should be bytecompiled at an older version and "no" at this
> > version. I wonder why the installation script didn't delete the old
> > bytecompiled version.
>
> Because it's not implemented? :) Try re-bytecompiling it, and then try to
> run it.
You're right. After
rm /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/dotfile/english/bash/bytecompile
dotfile bash bytecompile
it starts without problems. IMHO the dotfile-* packages (OK, not
dotfile-doc ;-) ) should make the 'rm' when installing a newer version.
> > > What are the versions of Tcl/Tk packages installed?
> >
> > My potato has the newest packages as of yesterday morning.
>
> But which Tcl/Tk packages do you have installed - version 7.6, 8.0, 8.2,
> TkStep...?
Tcl/Tk 8.0 and 8.2
no TkStep installed
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
