On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 06:55:09PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If it is a name change of package, shouldn't it be then: > provides xmgr > replaces xmgr > conflicts xmgr > which should ensure (?) removal of xmgr when grace is installed and > still satisfy dependencies, if there are any
xmgr has some features that are not implemented in grace (yet). That is why xmgr should not be removed during the installation of grace. Maybe we can remove xmgr when grace implements all the xmgr stuff (probably next year?). Grace is not only a name change, it is a cleaner GPL version of the somewhat old xmgr which is a descendant from ace/gr. > or are they really meant to coexist peacefully in one machine? Yes. Torsten -- Torsten Werner, Dipl.-Phys. Dresden University of Technology email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone/fax: +49 3501 530061/11 Vote against SPAM! http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
pgpoMemPIPhDV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
