Your message dated 22 Jun 1999 18:59:08 -0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#25910: fixed in xanim 2.80.1-3 has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database) Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 1998 20:55:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 20861 invoked from network); 18 Aug 1998 20:55:55 -0000 Received: from kite.kitenet.net (HELO kitenet.net) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 18 Aug 1998 20:55:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 17783 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 1998 20:51:16 -0000 Date: 18 Aug 1998 20:51:16 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xanim: source includes cinepak, etc modules To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6 Package: xanim Version: 2.70.6.4-9 The source appears to include dotofiles.tgz, that contains all 3 modules. It also contains xa2.0_cvid_linuxELF.o and xa2.0_iv32_linuxELF.o and xa1.0_cyuv_linuxELF.o right in the .orig.tar.gz file. Since make clean deletes them, if you run debian/rules clean binary, you get an xanim that's legal, if you run debian/rules binary right after unpacking, you get one linked with the modules. If we can't distribute them, they shouldn't be in the source tarball. If we can distribute them, debian/README.Debian is incorrect. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.0 Kernel Version: Linux kite 2.1.115 #2 Fri Aug 7 23:02:26 PDT 1998 i586 unknown Versions of the packages xanim depends on:
