Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:50:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 1998 11:21:30 +0000
Received: (qmail 2608 invoked from network); 27 Dec 1998 11:21:30 -0000
Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Dec 1998 11:21:30 -0000
Received: from wyvern ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.247.40.193])
by irwell.zetnet.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA02549;
Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:21:19 GMT
Received: from bridgett by wyvern with local (Exim 2.05 #1)
id 0ztsA0-0002EP-00 (Debian); Sat, 26 Dec 1998 11:45:32 +0000
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 11:45:32 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: request: FvwmCommand and FvwmCommandS in fvwm2 package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.12i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Zack Brown on Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at
09:01:43AM -0500
From: Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: fvwm2
Version: 2.0.46-BETA-3
Severity: wishlist
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 09:01:43AM -0500, Zack Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could the FvwmCommand and FvwmCommandS modules be included in the fvwm2
> package? They are really one of the only things that allow high powered
> configuration of fvwm. The ability of scripts to interact directly with the
> window manager, getting and setting variables, would be a real benefit to
> Debian as a whole, IMO.
>
> I hope this is the right forum to voice these issues.
Filing a bug is better (I've sent this email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using
the "bug" command). That way it's there for all to see (very useful if
someone comes along and packages fvwm2.1 (hint hint <g>))
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers
Avoid tiresome goat sacrifices -=- use Debian Linux http://www.debian.org
