Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:10:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293801: qa.debian.org: please show packages with
"Uploaders" header
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 20:43:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 12:43:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from on.debian.linux.org.pl (localhost.localdomain) [80.48.213.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxWmZ-0002fH-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:43:56 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 273963BB85; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:43:47 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: please show packages with "Uploaders" header
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 21:43:47 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Would be great if http://qa.debian.org/developer.php could show also
packages where I'm mentioned as uploader.
regards
fEnIo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCBTADhQui3hP+/EARAogtAKCqgj5xdxTFrTTsxrHbbUK1zchykwCfT7xg
Ucd9LncvtOOyLxDgFFtPMxE=
=2nRp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293801-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 08:11:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 00:11:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rtr.skawsoft.com.pl (localhost.localdomain) [213.25.37.67]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxhW0-0002xj-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 00:11:32 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0F1493BB85; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:10:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 09:10:57 +0100
From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#293801: qa.debian.org: please show packages with "Uploaders"
header
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:07:10PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > Try http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dfenio%40o2.pl&comaint=
=3Dyes
> >=20
> > No it doesn't.
> >=20
> > It only shows packages which have "somebody-sponsoring-somebody" as an
> > email address. Or maybe it's updated seldom than once a day.
>=20
> Can you give a specific example which package is not listed?
Sorry, I was wrong. Now it works, but my page was refreshed after almost=20
two days and seems I'm a little impatient.
I'm closing this bugreport now, and once again sorry for a noise.
regards
fEnIo
--=20
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fE=
nIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCBdERhQui3hP+/EARAiQ8AKCQw1RjRm01Pn87ArGRM3mya2J8EgCfQ5xj
tUd6peawFaMa3DOfOmTKW74=
=R1h/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
