Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Karl Goetz wrote:
>> Hi, The following files might also be DFSG problems:
>>
>> BSDish licence + advertising clauses.
>
> BSD + advertising clause is DFSG compliant.
>
>> These have no licence grant:
>> ./ippd/md4.{c,h}
>> radius.c
>
> This code comes from RFC 1186:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1186
>
>> These have no grant of redistribution:
>> ./ipppd/md5.{c,h}
>
> It's a standard BSD-like license.
>
> None of the above are non-free. Bernd, what firmware blobs did you find?
I only had a look into the new upstream tarball as I thought about preparing a
QA upload.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
